The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.
The wind and solar boondoggles that Pembina loves are raising prices to consumers and industry while doing exactly zip for the climate
I suggested in this space on Wednesday that the U.S. State Department’s final Environmental Impact Statement on the Keystone XL pipeline was optimistic — even misleading — in suggesting that “Approval or denial of any one crude oil transport project… is unlikely to significantly impact the rate of extraction in the oil sands…”
That’s because the diehard opponents of the oil sands are standing across not just “any one” project, but all of them, and certainly the major pipeline proposals: Enbridge’s Northern Gateway, the expansion of the TransMountain system, and TransCanada’s Energy East proposal.
Sure enough, confirmation of this perspective was provided almost immediately this week when the Pembina Institute – a leading local branch plant of the global environmental NGO cabal and a shill for the renewables industry — produced a report claiming that Energy East threatened “significant” increased emissions of greenhouse gas gases, with “major environmental ramifications.”