Direct action threat shows fragile peace on Nishnawbi Aski land [Northern Ontario First Nations] – by Shawn Bell (Wawatay News – April 26, 2012)

This article came from Wawatay News: http://www.wawataynews.ca/

Remember back in January when all sides were talking about the new relationship between the federal government and First Nations? Phrases like resetting the relationship, unlocking the potential and realizing the promise were being bandied about by everyone involved.
 
Those days seem like a long time ago. Since then a number of major resource projects have taxed the federal government-First Nations relationship. Paramount is the Northern Gateway pipeline that would bring oilsands bitumen to BC’s west coast, for transport by supertanker to Chinese refineries. Over 50 First Nations oppose that project, including nations with traditional lands all along the pipeline’s route.
 
Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver lumped together opponents to the pipeline, including First Nations, environmentalists and labour organizations, as “radicals” out to stop all development. He stated publically that these radical groups are being funded by foreign money in order to “undermine Canada’s national economic interest.”

Read more

Transmountain: Same pipeline, new realities – by Claudia Cattaneo (National Post – April 27, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

In 2008, Kinder Morgan Canada added 75,000 barrels of capacity to its Trans Mountain pipeline from Edmonton to Vancouver at a cost of $750-million, which included 13 new pump stations, twinning the system through Jasper National Park in Alberta and Mount Robson Provincial Park in British Columbia.
 
It faced little opposition, completed its regulatory hearing within a week, and provided contracting and employment to the Aseniwuche Winewak and Simpcw First Nations and the Alberta Metis Zone IV community. When the project was completed, the Town of Jasper and the Village of Valemount thanked Kinder Morgan Canada for the opportunity.

Today, the company’s president, Ian Anderson, has cleared his deck and plans to dedicate the next five years of his career to a single goal — win support for and build a $5-billion expansion of the same pipeline, which has been in operation for 62 years. He is planning a campaign of unprecedented magnitude for his company, a unit of the Houston-based infrastructure giant, Kinder Morgan Energy Partners.

Read more

Will pipelines be activist B.C.’s latest trophy? – by Claudia Cattaneo (National Post – April 26, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

VICTORIA – During the past few months, the main front in the fight against development of the Alberta-based oil sands has moved to British Columbia. It’s a situation the westernmost province is uncomfortable with and an expansion it’s unmotivated to defend.

The aggressive push by the oil sands industry and the Alberta and federal governments to open a new market for Canadian oil through shipments from the West Coast has been met by equally forceful resistance starting at the AlbertaB.C. border.

Anger has escalated since the start of public hearings in January into the Northern Gateway pipeline, proposed by Calgary-based Enbridge Inc., interrupting years of friendly relations between the neighbouring provinces, particularly on energy development.

Indeed, condemnation of the pipeline through B.C.’s rugged north and its associated oil tanker traffic has erupted into the type of popular revolt that is becoming a B.C. mainstay – from the campaign against the harmonized sales tax to the fight to preserve the Great Bear Rainforest and the moratorium on oil tanker traffic and offshore drilling.

Read more

Oil sands turns out as big winner – by Claudia Cattaneo (National Post – April 25, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

Joe Oliver, the federal Natural Resources Minister, will find a partner in Alberta’s newly re-elected Premier in his efforts to promote the oil sands at home and abroad, a strategy he said is beginning to show results in Europe and in the United States.

Alison Redford’s Conservatives held on to power by a wide margin in Monday’s provincial vote, fending off a threat from the upstart Wildrose party.

Ms. Redford is pushing for a Canadian energy strategy to promote a national dialogue to encourage co-operation on energy and plans to spend billions in oil sands research to ensure environmentally responsible development. “This election was about choice, a choice to put up walls or build bridges,” Ms. Redford told supporters Monday evening. “Tonight Alberta chose to build bridges.”

While the federal government doesn’t see the need for an energy strategy, Mr. Oliver said Canada has a huge opportunity to sell its oil to new markets looking for energy security, but it will take a sustained and broad communication effort to defend the unconventional resource and he expects Alberta’s Premier to do her part.

Read more

Oil industry the big winner in Alberta election – by Gillian Steward (Toronto Star – April 24, 2012)

The Toronto Star, has the largest circulation in Canada. The paper has an enormous impact on federal and Ontario politics as well as shaping public opinion.

Gillian Steward is a Calgary writer and journalist, and former managing editor of the Calgary Herald. Her column appears every other week.

For once the outcome of an Alberta election was completely unpredictable. Right up until the end the two leading contenders — Alison Redford’s PCs and Danielle Smith’s Wildrose party — were locked in a bitter battle for control of government. But one outcome was entirely predictable.

No matter which party won there would be no sudden changes when it came to oil sands development and all the risks and rewards that go with it, not just for Alberta but for the rest of Canada. The oil sands and energy policy in general were simply not on the election agenda.

Party leaders barely mentioned the oil sands; it wasn’t a big issue in the news media; at the public forums I attended not one person questioned candidates about oil sands policy. Official oil industry voices were noticeably silent for the entire campaign.

Read more

Ottawa’s smart, but risky, plan [environmental assessment reviews] – National Post Editorial (April 23, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

The federal government is taking a courageous but risky step in its plan to streamline the process for environmental assessment reviews. Courageous because there’s a good case to be made for eliminating the delays, overlap, inefficiency and political guerrilla tactics that can afflict otherwise harmless projects. The danger is that the slightest slip could leave the government looking like the environmental scofflaw its critics claim it to be.

Companies seeking approval for projects that could impact the environment enter a world that can often seem surreal. Both Ottawa and the provinces alike claim the right to review and assess projects. Sometimes they both pick the same project, though for different reasons, and using different criteria. Provincial reviews can be quicker, but may be overruled by a federal review. Federal reviews may be more intense, but provincial ones sometimes take in a wider array of concerns. This can prove beneficial, since a positive impact on a local economy may be deemed to outweigh a potential negative impact on the environment. Or not.

One news report notes that, in British Columbia, there are 562 projects under review by Ottawa, and 69 by the province. Two-thirds of the projects under provincial review will also need a federal review. In addition to the duplication, cost and proliferation of red tape, there is the danger of being caught up in the web of Big Environment, in which activist groups deliberately adopt delaying tactics in an effort to attract public attention and frustrate project backers.

Read more

A vote on Canada’s energy priorities – by Claudia Cattaneo (National Post – April 21, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

Albertans will know who their next premier will be Monday and the winner of the hotly contested provincial election between the Wildrose Party and the ruling Conservatives will have a big impact on the rest of Canada.

Both right-of-centre parties are well-liked by the province’s dominant oil-and-gas industry because of their favourable views of development, particularly of the oil sands.

But they project different styles, espouse different levels of government involvement and push different pet projects that have the potential to reshape Canada’s energy priorities.

If Danielle Smith’s Wildrose overthrows Alison Redford’s Conservative dynasty, as polls suggest, Canadians should expect a bolder approach by Alberta to develop and sell its energy riches. It will closely reflect that of Stephen Harper’s federal Conservative government.

Read more

New Keystone route aims to avoid environmentally fragile areas – by Shawn McCarthy (Globe and Mail – April 20, 2012)

The Globe and Mail is Canada’s national newspaper with the second largest broadsheet circulation in the country. It has enormous influence on Canada’s political and business elite.

Ottawa – TransCanada Corp. (TRP-T42.91—-%)plans a 32-kilometre detour – at no extra cost – for its long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline, and hopes the change will be sufficient to win approval from the U.S. State Department.

In a filing with the government of Nebraska, the Calgary-based pipeline company said the new route should allay concerns that the pipeline will threaten the state’s Sandhills region, considered a fragile environmental zone.

“The primary goal of the Nebraska reroute effort is to avoid the area defined by the [state’s Department of Environmental Quality] as the Sandhills region,” the report says.

In December, the Nebraska environment department provided TransCanada with a map that identified the extent of Sandhills region, saying the company needed to know what area to avoid.

Read more

A regulatory burden lifted but opposition remains – by Gary Mason (Globe and Mail – April 19, 2012)

The Globe and Mail is Canada’s national newspaper with the second largest broadsheet circulation in the country. It has enormous influence on Canada’s political and business elite.

Governing is so much more fun with a majority, as Prime Minister Stephen Harper reminds us every day. Opposition parties can yell and scream all they want, but the Conservatives don’t have to listen. They can kill the long-gun registry and bring in an omnibus crime bill and simply plug their ears when Liberals and New Democrats get up in the House of Commons to complain.

The latest move by the federal government to upset the Opposition is a plan to streamline – some would say neuter – the environmental assessment process. The Conservatives have been telegraphing this one for a while.

Mr. Harper has staked the economic future of the country on the resource riches of The West, and why not? In particular, the Prime Minister is focused on helping Alberta get its crude to market as quickly as possible. Future federal budget surpluses depend on it.

In the Prime Minister’s home province of Alberta, they still talk about the Mackenzie Valley gas pipeline project, which ultimately died, in part because of a burdensome regulatory assessment process that dragged on for years.

Read more

Argentina’s expropriation of energy company only isolates country – Globe and Mail Editorial (April 19, 2012)

The Globe and Mail is Canada’s national newspaper with the second largest broadsheet circulation in the country. It has enormous influence on Canada’s political and business elite.

The decision by Argentina’s President to nationalize the country’s largest energy company may pander to popular sentiment at home, but will only further isolate the country internationally.

President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner announced the expropriation of 51 per cent of Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales to a cheering audience on live television on Monday.

This is a losing cause – just as is Argentina’s claim for sovereignty of the British-controlled Falkland Islands.

The country already has a weak standing in world financial markets, following its failure to repay all of its loans after defaulting on a $100-billion debt in 2001. The latest move will cause more uncertainty and make it more difficult to attract the kind of foreign investment and expert partners needed to develop Argentina’s reserves of shale hydrocarbons.

Read more

Ottawa needs to reassure Canadians that its new environmental review policies are sound – Toronto Star Editorial (April 19, 2012)

The Toronto Star, has the largest circulation in Canada. The paper has an enormous impact on federal and Ontario politics as well as shaping public opinion.

If Canadians could trust Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government to manage both our oil- and mineral-rich economy and the environment that surrounds it, it would be easy to welcome Ottawa’s plan for simpler, faster and more coherent environmental assessments. The current system is undeniably flawed.

But given Harper’s past hostility to green causes, it’s only natural to question his motives and worry about the impact of his reforms.

It’s easy to illustrate how the system falls down now. Even picayune projects need assessments, like adding more office space inside a federal building, replacing an old military generator, or washing fruit on a blueberry farm.

Meanwhile, federal assessments for major work can take years to launch, and years to finish. One Alberta oil sands project took almost six years before approval was granted. Uncertainty and delays on this scale could discourage investors and sacrifice Canadian jobs at a time when we can’t afford to lose either.

Read more

Despite hyperbole, environmental fast-tracking won’t give ‘big oil’ a ‘free pass’ – by John Ivison (National Post – April 18, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

 Joe Oliver sounded like Robin Williams in the Dead Poets Society, as he urged Canadians to carpe diem — seize the day.
 
The Natural Resources Minister was visiting an engineering company in Toronto to highlight new legislation aimed at streamlining regulatory reviews on big energy projects, first revealed in the March budget.
 
“We are at a critical juncture. The global economy has presented Canada with an historic opportunity….We must seize the moment if we want to tap into the tremendous appetite for resources in dynamic, emerging economies.” To hear Mr. Oliver tell it, the problem of getting oil-sands crude to markets in Asia will be solved by his bill, which he claims will yield “timely, effective and efficient project reviews.”
 
The goal is to reduce to 24 months environmental reviews of major projects like the Northern Gateway pipeline from the oil sands to the B.C. coast. Mr. Oliver pointed out that some mine applications have taken up to six years before winning approval. “What kind of message does that send to investors?” he asked.

Read more

Ottawa elbows regulators in quest for final word on pipeline approvals – by Shawn McCarthy (Globe and Mail – April 18, 2012)

The Globe and Mail is Canada’s national newspaper with the second largest broadsheet circulation in the country. It has enormous influence on Canada’s political and business elite.

The federal government is asserting its control over pipelines – including the proposed Northern Gateway oil-sands project – taking from regulators the final word on approvals and limiting the ability of opponents to intervene in environmental assessments.

In proposed legislation unveiled by Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver on Tuesday, the Harper government will clear away regulatory hurdles to the rapid development of Canada’s natural resource bounty.

Ottawa is aiming to reduce the number of projects that undergo federal environmental assessment by exempting smaller developments completely and by handing over many large ones to the provinces. It will also bring in new measures to prevent project opponents from delaying the assessment process by flooding hearings with individuals who face no direct impacts but want to speak against the development.

Read more

What if the U.S. becomes an oil exporter? – by Jeffrey Simpson (Globe and Mail – April 18, 2012)

The Globe and Mail is Canada’s national newspaper with the second largest broadsheet circulation in the country. It has enormous influence on Canada’s political and business elite.

Since the middle of the last century, the United States has been a net importer of oil (and not many years ago, it imported about two-thirds of its yearly consumption). The assumption of continued U.S. dependence on “foreign” oil provided one foundation stone for future Canadian prosperity. Canada, a self-described “energy superpower,” would always be able to send ever-larger quantities of oil to slake our neighbour’s insatiable thirst.

But what if the U.S. becomes an oil exporter, no longer needing anyone else’s oil? The change – or threat, if you prefer – for Canada would be immense. Indeed, it’s not too far-fetched to say that all the assumptions on which Canada has based its fossil-fuel industries can no longer be taken as axiomatically correct.

For the bitumen oil in Alberta, the future could be particularly murky. The oil resources there are immense, but finding markets for that oil might be very hard, indeed. Not only might the U.S. need less and less, but opposition to pipelines through British Columbia to ship oil to Asia is so intense that no guarantee exists they’ll be built for a very long time, if ever.

Read more

Argentina’s move to take control of YPF could jeopardize foreign investment – by Shawn McCarthy (Globe and Mail – April 17, 2012)

The Globe and Mail is Canada’s national newspaper with the second largest broadsheet circulation in the country. It has enormous influence on Canada’s political and business elite.

OTTAWA — Argentina is planning to nationalize control of the country’s largest oil company, a move that could discourage foreign investors in one of the world’s hottest emerging oil and gas plays.
 
President Cristina Fernandez on Monday sent a bill to the country’s Congress to expropriate 51 per cent of the shares of YPF, the Argentine subsidiary of Spain’s Repsol, complaining the company is failing to meet its investment obligations in the country.

The move has heightened concern among investors in companies exploring for oil and gas in the country – including several Canadian plays.
 
In addition to U.S. giants such as Exxon Mobil Corp. and Apache Corp., (APA-N94.552.282.47%) Calgary-based companies that have properties in the South American country include Americas Petrogas Inc., (BOE-X2.38-0.46-16.20%) Gran Tierra Energy Inc., (GTE-T6.24-0.05-0.79%) and ArPetrol Ltd. (RPT-X0.05-0.005-9.09%)

Read more