Industry quiet as public concern grows over China’s energy influence in Canada – by Jameson Berkow (National Post – May 10, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

China’s growing influence in oil sands development might be the most important issue facing Canada’s energy sector that nobody is talking about.
 
Canadian companies have happily accepted billions of dollars in investments from Chinese state-owned enterprises in recent years on the basis that the energy-hungry emerging Asian superpower will soon be their best customer.
 
Meanwhile, as the public grows increasingly concerned about the potential importation into Canada of questionable Chinese corporate practices and opposition politicians raise questions of possible interference with Canada’s national interests, industry associations, environmental groups and the government of Canada itself have stayed mute.

“Any enterprise that is owned by another nation state raises sovereignty issues, but in the case of China the security advisors to the government of Canada for a long time have expressed particular concern about Chinese influence,” Elizabeth May, leader of the Green Party of Canada, said in an interview this week.

Read more

How to sustainably turn Canada’s resources into wealth – by Brian Emmett (Globe and Mail – May 7, 2012)

The Globe and Mail is Canada’s national newspaper with the second largest broadsheet circulation in the country. It has enormous influence on Canada’s political and business elite.

Brian Emmett is a principal at the Ottawa-based consulting firm Sussex Circle. He served as Canada’s first commissioner of the environment and sustainable development, and was an assistant deputy minister (policy) at Environment Canada, a vice-president (policy) at the Canadian International Development Agency and an assistant deputy minister (Canadian Forest Service) at Natural Resources Canada.

The way policy-makers and Canadians think about natural resources (fossil fuels, minerals and forest resources) is fundamentally important to the Canadian economy. How we perceive and evaluate our natural resource endowment shapes policy frameworks, which, in turn, can have profound effects on the way we live and the way we earn our living.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper touched on this during the Summit of the Americas in Cartagena last month, saying: “Resource development has vast power to change the way a nation lives. … It is also something which is tremendously responsive to actions of government.”

Read more

Enbridge AGM: Pipeline protest drums pits pipelines against land, water – by VAnessa Lu (Toronto Star – May 10, 2012)

The Toronto Star, has the largest circulation in Canada. The paper has an enormous impact on federal and Ontario politics as well as shaping public opinion.

The proposed Northern Gateway pipeline appears locked on a collision course, as First Nations chiefs put Enbridge officials on notice again that they won’t budge from their opposition.

“We are a very patient people,” warned Chief Na’moks of the Wet-suwet’en nation, near Smithers, B.C., at Enbridge’s annual general meeting in Toronto on Wednesday.

“We don’t base the wellbeing of life on money,” said April Churchill, vice-president of the Haida Nation. “Money will not change our minds. “There is no compensation that is acceptable that will kill off cultures and kill off people.”

First Nations leaders have repeatedly sent their message to Enbridge officials, and they travelled thousands of kilometres from British Columbia by train, to make their point again in Toronto.

Read more

Tom Mulcair’s call for environmental responsibility hits nerve in the West – by Tim Harper (Toronto Star – May 9, 2012)

The Toronto Star, has the largest circulation in Canada. The paper has an enormous impact on federal and Ontario politics as well as shaping public opinion.

When Tom Mulcair, then a prospective NDP leader, wrote in an influential magazine last winter that Alberta’s oilsands have artificially driven up the Canadian dollar and hurt manufacturing in central Canada, his remarks received scant notice.
 
Mulcair was largely adding his voice to a view espoused by Premier Dalton McGuinty and a number of commentators and analysts.
 
When he repeated an abridged version of his Policy Options argument on the CBC last weekend, the reaction in western Canada verged on the hysterical.

Stephen Harper surrogates in right-wing media and think tanks joined Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall in hurling invective at the NDP leader, accusing him of trying to divide the country, demonizing the West, pandering to Quebec and misunderstanding history and politics.
 
It appears that in a matter of a few months two things had happened to turn an op-ed piece in a policy magazine into a civil war.

Read more

Enbridge braces for more pipeline backlash as annual meeting nears – by Jameson Berkow (National Post – May 7, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

CALGARY — As if Enbridge Inc. could not hear the cries of protests over the Northern Gateway pipeline at its annual meeting in Calgary last year, what will hit the company in Toronto on Wednesday is expected to be even louder.
 
Public hearings into the $5.5-billion project to bring crude oil from Bruderheim, Alta. 1,172-kilometre west to the Pacific coast town of Kitimat, B.C. — and from there to energy-hungry markets in Asia — have since begun, serving as a focal point for criticism. Canada’s largest crude transporter has also opted to hold this year’s AGM in the country’s financial capital, where many groups opposing the pipeline command a strong presence and where the risk of a public relations backlash affecting the company’s share price is heightened.

As members of the Calgary-based Enbridge executive team make the trip to Toronto this week, a train carrying some of Northern Gateway’s most vocal critics is close behind. Hundreds of protestors are expected to rally outside the AGM, with a “Freedom Train” set to arrive Wednesday carrying dozens of members of the Yinka Dene Alliance, a group of British Columbia First Nations opposed to the project.

Read more

Is Canada taking China for granted when it comes to energy? – by Claudia Cattaneo (National Post – May 4, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

In the debate about whether Canada should welcome China’s growing investment in our energy, a couple of crucial points have been getting little air time: Canada’s energy isn’t as indispensible to China as some assume, and China is at least as motivated by learning how to operate in a Western market economy as it is by securing energy to fuel its future.
 
Junsai Zhang, China’s ambassador to Canada, drove those points home Friday — a rare attempt by the country to add its voice and bring back to reality a Canadian discussion it feels has gotten way ahead of itself.

“We haven’t imported one drop of oil,” Mr. Zhang said in an interview in Calgary. “It’s too early to say China imports your oil and gas. We are in a very good collaboration with Australia, with other Western countries. No problems. If we don’t import from here, we import from other countries. It’s OK.”
 
It’s a sobering and unexpected message. For all the concern about China’s increasing presence in Canada, not having the option of selling to that market would be a major setback. It would also be a missed opportunity to show global leadership.
 

Read more

North America to lead global energy investments in 2012 – by Yadullah Hussain (National Post – April 30, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

Move over, Middle East: North America looks set to lead the global energy investment drive this year, with companies expected to spend $392-billion on upstream capital and operating expenditures in the region, according to forecasts of IHS CERA, an energy consultancy.
 
“Capex (alone) is expected to reach US$274-billion in 2012, driven by the region’s boom in unconventional production including oil sands, tight oil, shale gas, tight gas and coal bed methane, which are forecast to account for US$128-billion of the 2012 total,” noted IHS CERA in a report published Monday. “Driven by continued investment in unconventional resources, total North America spending is expected to reach US$528-billion in 2016.”
 
Capital spending in the oil sands sector is forecast to reach 28% to US$18.5-billion in 2012, rising US$28-billion by 2016 as high oil prices spurs expansion plans, the Cambride-based consultancy estimates. 

“The U.S. and North America currently make up 50% of all drilling activity in the world,” Candida Scott, senior director at IHS CERA told the Financial Post in an interview.

Read more

TransCanada mulls switching natural gas mainline to oil service – by Claudia Cattaneo (National Post – April 28, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

CALGARY — TransCanada Corp. said it’s taking a serious look at converting its underused mainline, Canada’s largest natural gas pipeline, to oil service, a prospect that would give a big boost to the idea of a Canadian solution to anti-oil sands activism by shipping more of Canada’s Western oil to Eastern consumers.
 
CEO Russ Girling said Friday refiners in Eastern Canada and oil producers in Western Canada are keen on the concept and have asked TransCanada to look into the feasibility of converting parts of the system.
 
“We are going to actively pursue it and see if we can turn it into an opportunity for both, the oil and gas industry and TransCanada,” Mr. Girling told reporters after addressing the company’s annual meeting.
 
The giant pipeline is TransCanada’s original business and is one of Canada’s nation-building infrastructures. For decades, it is has moved natural gas from Empress, Alta., down to the U.S. northeast and into Ontario and Quebec.

Read more

Direct action threat shows fragile peace on Nishnawbi Aski land [Northern Ontario First Nations] – by Shawn Bell (Wawatay News – April 26, 2012)

This article came from Wawatay News: http://www.wawataynews.ca/

Remember back in January when all sides were talking about the new relationship between the federal government and First Nations? Phrases like resetting the relationship, unlocking the potential and realizing the promise were being bandied about by everyone involved.
 
Those days seem like a long time ago. Since then a number of major resource projects have taxed the federal government-First Nations relationship. Paramount is the Northern Gateway pipeline that would bring oilsands bitumen to BC’s west coast, for transport by supertanker to Chinese refineries. Over 50 First Nations oppose that project, including nations with traditional lands all along the pipeline’s route.
 
Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver lumped together opponents to the pipeline, including First Nations, environmentalists and labour organizations, as “radicals” out to stop all development. He stated publically that these radical groups are being funded by foreign money in order to “undermine Canada’s national economic interest.”

Read more

Transmountain: Same pipeline, new realities – by Claudia Cattaneo (National Post – April 27, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

In 2008, Kinder Morgan Canada added 75,000 barrels of capacity to its Trans Mountain pipeline from Edmonton to Vancouver at a cost of $750-million, which included 13 new pump stations, twinning the system through Jasper National Park in Alberta and Mount Robson Provincial Park in British Columbia.
 
It faced little opposition, completed its regulatory hearing within a week, and provided contracting and employment to the Aseniwuche Winewak and Simpcw First Nations and the Alberta Metis Zone IV community. When the project was completed, the Town of Jasper and the Village of Valemount thanked Kinder Morgan Canada for the opportunity.

Today, the company’s president, Ian Anderson, has cleared his deck and plans to dedicate the next five years of his career to a single goal — win support for and build a $5-billion expansion of the same pipeline, which has been in operation for 62 years. He is planning a campaign of unprecedented magnitude for his company, a unit of the Houston-based infrastructure giant, Kinder Morgan Energy Partners.

Read more

Will pipelines be activist B.C.’s latest trophy? – by Claudia Cattaneo (National Post – April 26, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

VICTORIA – During the past few months, the main front in the fight against development of the Alberta-based oil sands has moved to British Columbia. It’s a situation the westernmost province is uncomfortable with and an expansion it’s unmotivated to defend.

The aggressive push by the oil sands industry and the Alberta and federal governments to open a new market for Canadian oil through shipments from the West Coast has been met by equally forceful resistance starting at the AlbertaB.C. border.

Anger has escalated since the start of public hearings in January into the Northern Gateway pipeline, proposed by Calgary-based Enbridge Inc., interrupting years of friendly relations between the neighbouring provinces, particularly on energy development.

Indeed, condemnation of the pipeline through B.C.’s rugged north and its associated oil tanker traffic has erupted into the type of popular revolt that is becoming a B.C. mainstay – from the campaign against the harmonized sales tax to the fight to preserve the Great Bear Rainforest and the moratorium on oil tanker traffic and offshore drilling.

Read more

Oil sands turns out as big winner – by Claudia Cattaneo (National Post – April 25, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

Joe Oliver, the federal Natural Resources Minister, will find a partner in Alberta’s newly re-elected Premier in his efforts to promote the oil sands at home and abroad, a strategy he said is beginning to show results in Europe and in the United States.

Alison Redford’s Conservatives held on to power by a wide margin in Monday’s provincial vote, fending off a threat from the upstart Wildrose party.

Ms. Redford is pushing for a Canadian energy strategy to promote a national dialogue to encourage co-operation on energy and plans to spend billions in oil sands research to ensure environmentally responsible development. “This election was about choice, a choice to put up walls or build bridges,” Ms. Redford told supporters Monday evening. “Tonight Alberta chose to build bridges.”

While the federal government doesn’t see the need for an energy strategy, Mr. Oliver said Canada has a huge opportunity to sell its oil to new markets looking for energy security, but it will take a sustained and broad communication effort to defend the unconventional resource and he expects Alberta’s Premier to do her part.

Read more

Oil industry the big winner in Alberta election – by Gillian Steward (Toronto Star – April 24, 2012)

The Toronto Star, has the largest circulation in Canada. The paper has an enormous impact on federal and Ontario politics as well as shaping public opinion.

Gillian Steward is a Calgary writer and journalist, and former managing editor of the Calgary Herald. Her column appears every other week.

For once the outcome of an Alberta election was completely unpredictable. Right up until the end the two leading contenders — Alison Redford’s PCs and Danielle Smith’s Wildrose party — were locked in a bitter battle for control of government. But one outcome was entirely predictable.

No matter which party won there would be no sudden changes when it came to oil sands development and all the risks and rewards that go with it, not just for Alberta but for the rest of Canada. The oil sands and energy policy in general were simply not on the election agenda.

Party leaders barely mentioned the oil sands; it wasn’t a big issue in the news media; at the public forums I attended not one person questioned candidates about oil sands policy. Official oil industry voices were noticeably silent for the entire campaign.

Read more

Ottawa’s smart, but risky, plan [environmental assessment reviews] – National Post Editorial (April 23, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

The federal government is taking a courageous but risky step in its plan to streamline the process for environmental assessment reviews. Courageous because there’s a good case to be made for eliminating the delays, overlap, inefficiency and political guerrilla tactics that can afflict otherwise harmless projects. The danger is that the slightest slip could leave the government looking like the environmental scofflaw its critics claim it to be.

Companies seeking approval for projects that could impact the environment enter a world that can often seem surreal. Both Ottawa and the provinces alike claim the right to review and assess projects. Sometimes they both pick the same project, though for different reasons, and using different criteria. Provincial reviews can be quicker, but may be overruled by a federal review. Federal reviews may be more intense, but provincial ones sometimes take in a wider array of concerns. This can prove beneficial, since a positive impact on a local economy may be deemed to outweigh a potential negative impact on the environment. Or not.

One news report notes that, in British Columbia, there are 562 projects under review by Ottawa, and 69 by the province. Two-thirds of the projects under provincial review will also need a federal review. In addition to the duplication, cost and proliferation of red tape, there is the danger of being caught up in the web of Big Environment, in which activist groups deliberately adopt delaying tactics in an effort to attract public attention and frustrate project backers.

Read more

A vote on Canada’s energy priorities – by Claudia Cattaneo (National Post – April 21, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

Albertans will know who their next premier will be Monday and the winner of the hotly contested provincial election between the Wildrose Party and the ruling Conservatives will have a big impact on the rest of Canada.

Both right-of-centre parties are well-liked by the province’s dominant oil-and-gas industry because of their favourable views of development, particularly of the oil sands.

But they project different styles, espouse different levels of government involvement and push different pet projects that have the potential to reshape Canada’s energy priorities.

If Danielle Smith’s Wildrose overthrows Alison Redford’s Conservative dynasty, as polls suggest, Canadians should expect a bolder approach by Alberta to develop and sell its energy riches. It will closely reflect that of Stephen Harper’s federal Conservative government.

Read more