Opportunities for Northern Ontario’s Bioenergy Resources – by Dr. Peter Telford (April 17, 2013)

These remarks are from the CI Ontario Power Conference on April 17, 2013, during a panel discussion about the Ring of Fire and Northern Development: Addressing the Challenges of Generation, Transmission and Project Development in Northern Ontario.

Dr. Peter Telford

One of the many challenges for renewable energy, whether it be wind, solar or biomass, and why, with current technologies and economies, renewables will rarely be able to fully replace base-load power supplied by fossil fuels or nuclear, are the inherent limitations – the wind doesn’t always blow, the sun doesn’t always shine, biomass resources in their various forms are not always in abundant supply or in the right place.

In the past day and a half we have heard lots of references to wind and solar so I’ll focus these brief remarks on biomass which, of course, is the principal interest of my company. This is not intended to be a promo for Peat Resources Limited but I’m happy if the name catches your attention.

Biomass can be many things – wood waste from the forest products industry, dedicated agricultural crops, waste generated by other farming or food processing activity, or my personal favourite, peat, which has been used to produce electricity in Europe for many generations. While they have obvious environmental advantages, there are also limitations to these types of bioenergy resources competing economically with traditional fossil fuels – especially in this current time of very low natural gas prices.

Read more

Province’s green energy policy killing rural ON businesses – by Christina Blizzard (Toronot Sun – April 19, 2013)

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/home.html

TORONTO — Out of sight, out of mind. That’s the only way to explain the complacency urban residents have for the desecration of rural Ontario.

Politicians from small towns across the province came to Queen’s Park Thursday demanding the Kathleen Wynne government return decision-making to the local councils.

Huron-Bruce MPP Lisa Thompson brought a private member’s bill that would counter the Green Energy Act, which stripped local politicians of any say in the siting of wind and solar farms in their communities.

She says such projects are forcing up the cost of electricity and causing job losses in the manufacturing sector. Thompson says companies in her riding are struggling to pay their soaring hydro costs.

One auto parts company, West Cast Industries, told her they’ve had an extra $5 million added to their bill over the past nine months by way of the so-called global adjustment to pay for green energy. Those staggering costs are forcing companies to move to places where electricity is cheaper.

Read more

Renewable power just too costly – by Donald N. Dewees (National Post – April 18, 2013)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

High wind and solar costs hurt consumers as well as the environment

In May, 2009, Energy Minister George Smitherman oversaw the enactment of his Green Energy and Green Economy Act (GEA). It required that Ontario electricity consumers pay high prices for certain kinds of renewable power, including 13.5 cents/kWh for wind and up to 80.2 cents for small rooftop solar. Four years later Ontarians are asking if they can afford such big premiums for renewable power over the 8 cent cost of existing power.

As an environmentalist and past Director of the Sierra Club of Ontario, I like renewable power. As an electricity consumer I don’t want to pay too much. As an economist, environmentalist and consumer I believe that we should pay more for renewable power but the premium should not exceed the value of the avoided environmental and health effects plus the value of the avoided greenhouse gas damage from fossil power displaced.

Since Ontario is phasing out coal by the end of 2014, renewable power will mostly displace natural gas, which burns quite cleanly — its effects are very small, worth less than 1 cent per kWh. How much do we want to pay to reduce greenhouse gases? In my work I use $25/tonne of CO2 as a low estimate and $100/tonne as a high estimate based on studies of the future damage from global warming. These yield a total health, environmental and CO2 saving between 1.1 cents/kWh and 4.5 cents/kWh. This is the premium we could pay for clean electricity.

Read more

Ontario Liberal party should be on hook for wasted money – by Christina Blizzard (Toronto Sun – April 17, 2013)

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/home.html

TORONTO – What a wretched, wasteful, deceitful government this is. This week we got the full accounting for the disgraceful way the Liberals scrapped the Mississauga gas-fired generating plant in the heat of the 2011 election.

It was not the $190 million they consistently told us it would be. Auditor general Jim McCarter revealed Monday the bill for that piece of Liberal incompetence is $275 million.

This was a decision taken by the Liberal campaign team so, as Tory Frank Klees asked in the legislature Tuesday, why isn’t the Ontario Liberal Party on the hook for the bill?

“Given that it was a Liberal Party decision to incur $275 million of costs, will the premier agree that it’s the Liberal Party of Ontario that should pay that money?” Klees asked.

It’s about time also we put to an end this nonsense that it was something all parties agreed to do. It was a Liberal decision to build the two plants in Oakville and Mississauga. They picked the locations. It was a Liberal decision to cancel them. You can’t blame the two opposition parties for fixing the Liberals’ mistakes.

Read more

Privatization mania and NIMBY myopia behind Ontario gas plant scandal – by Martin Regg Cohn (Toronto Star – April 16, 2013)

The Toronto Star has the largest circulation in Canada. The paper has an enormous impact on federal and Ontario politics as well as shaping public opinion.

The real gas plant scandal in Ontario was our own wooly thinking — a highly charged blend of NIMBYism and ideological myopia.

Now that the auditor general has exposed the stench over the cancelled gas plant in Mississauga, Ontarians have every right to be angry. Let me count the ways:

Angry at the Liberals for overplaying their hand at election time — and downplaying the total $275 million cost until they were caught out.

Angry at the fledgling local contractor who constantly under-delivered on the stalled electricity project — yet overstated its costs when extorting more money from taxpayers.

Angry at the U.S. hedge fund that overcharged with an astonishing 14 per cent interest rate — then aggressively litigated when it had taxpayers trapped. Angry at the Ontario Power Authority for overestimating our electricity needs all along — then overpaying to dig the government out of a hole.

Read more

Smarts lacking in Liberal government gas plant decisions – by Christina Blizzard (Toronto Sun – April 16, 2013)

http://www.torontosun.com/home

TORONTO – How stupid are they? And what fools are we to buy their baloney by the pound? I’m talking of the Liberals and their outrageous decision to pull the plug on construction of the Mississauga power plant in the middle of the 2011 election.

Auditor general Jim McCarter produced a scathing report on the deal Monday. At the end of the day, he said, we’ll have built two power plants — and we may not even need one, since power needs have dropped since 2009.

It’s also clear the government has been lying through its teeth over the cost of scrapping the plant. The Liberals promised all along the cost would be $190 million. Now we find the true cost — $275 million.

McCarter’s detailed calculations show that lowball figure didn’t include costs such as the extra tab for delivering electricity to Mississauga from Lambton, near Sarnia.

The Liberals botched the deal at every turn, with side deals and trade-offs that gave away the store to Eastern Power, the parent of Greenfield, the company that built the plant. There were potential savings in the move to Lambton. The Dawn Hub gas storage plant is close to Sarnia, so there are savings in not having to bring the gas to Mississauga.

Read more

Cost of cancelled power plants passed on to consumers – by Christina Blizzard (Toronto Sun – April 13, 2013)

http://www.torontosun.com/

TORONTO — It was eight years ago when the government trumpeted its latest additions to the electricity supply.

In a press release from then-energy minister Dwight Duncan, the government announced two gas-fired plants for Mississauga that would, combined, supply 560 megawatts of “reliable, efficient power.”

The two projects, Greenfield North and Greenfield South have proved anything but reliable or efficient. Greenfield South was scrapped in the middle of the 2011 election campaign that saw Dalton McGuinty’s Liberals lose a large number of seats and squeezed to a minority.

It was the second time the Liberals had pulled the plug on a power plant. The previous year, they scrapped a plant under construction in Oakville. Again, political pressure was brought to bear on the Liberals.

On Monday, provincial auditor general Jim McCarter will release his report on the costs of scrapping the Mississauga plant.

In its press release announcing the plants, the government said they would provide power to replace coal-fired electricity and keep the lights on in the high-growth western part of the GTA.

Read more

Ontario Liberal’s Green Energy Act Ful of Hot Air – Christina Blizzard (Toronto Sun – April 12, 2013)

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/home.html

TORONTO — Wind blows — and so sadly does the Liberal government’s Green Energy Act. Even before the Fraser Institute came out with its damning report on wind and solar energy this week, the writing was on the wall.

Turbines have wreaked havoc on rural Ontario, ruining the countryside, pitting neighbour against neighbour as wind farms sprouted on once lovely fields.

We’ve gone from generating the cheapest electricity in the world to the most expensive in North America. The report, Environmental and Economic Consequences of Ontario’s Green Energy Act (GEA) authored by Ross McKitrick, recalls provincial auditor general Jim McCarter’s scathing 2011 report in which he said the province has already lost $2 billion in electricity exports because power generated by wind often has to be exported at a loss.

“Eighty percent of Ontario’s generation of electricity from wind power occurs at times and seasons so far out of phase with demand that the entire output is surplus and is exported at a substantial loss,” the report says. “Data from the Independent Electricity System Operator shows Ontario now loses, on average, $24,000 per operating hour on such sales, totalling $200 million annually.”

Read more

Ontario paying a high price for Green Energy Act – by Scott Stinson (National Post – April 11, 2013)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

The handy thing about the Ontario Liberals’ spectacular mishandling of the energy file, as an example of poor governance, is that there is really something for everyone.

A shameless political decision that came with a significant cost to the treasury? Hello, gas-plant cancellations.

A deliberate attempt to obscure the cost of those decisions by releasing only partial numbers? Testimony before the justice committee this week has shown the Liberals knew the $40-million cost of the Oakville cancellation that the former energy minister had insisted was the only true cost, in fact, referred only to sunk costs, and that the final bill would actually be much higher.

A punitive impact on taxpayers? The Ontario Energy Board announced last week that electricity rates will rise again on May 1, continuing a trend in which residential rates are expected to double over a 10-year period.

And, at the root of it all is the 2009 Green Energy Act, one of the signature policies of the McGuinty government, which comes in for quite a drubbing in a study from the Fraser Institute that will be released on Thursday.

The study, Consequences of Ontario’s Green Energy Act, doesn’t contain much that is new or unexpected to anyone who had paid close attention to the subject in recent years, but it lays out some key evidence about a policy decision that was designed to improve air quality while also fostering the creation of a “green jobs” economy.

Read more

NEWS RELEASE: Ontario’s Green Energy Act causing energy prices to soar; plan now 10 times costlier than alternative that would have yielded the same environmental benefits

http://www.fraserinstitute.org/default.aspx

April 11, 2013 – TORONTO, ON — Ontario’s Green Energy Act (GEA) will soon put the province at or near the top of North American electricity costs, with serious consequences for the province’s economic growth and competitiveness, concludes a new report from the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian think-tank.

“Already, the GEA has caused major price increases for large energy consumers, and we’re anticipating additional hikes of 40 to 50 per cent over the next few years,” said Ross McKitrick, Fraser Institute senior fellow and author of Environmental and Economic Consequences of Ontario’s Green Energy Act.

“The Ontario government defends the GEA by referring to a confidential 2005 cost-benefit analysis on reducing air pollution from power plants. That report did not recommend pursuing wind or solar power, instead it looked at conventional pollution control methods which would have yielded the same environmental benefits as the GEA, but at a tenth of the current cost. If the province sticks to its targets for expanding renewables, the GEA will end up being 70 times costlier than the alternative, with no greater benefits.”

Environmental and Economic Consequences of Ontario’s Green Energy Act analyzes the GEA and its effects on economic competitiveness and environmental improvement in Ontario.

Read more

NEWS RELEASE: GAS PLANT SCANDAL HITTING YOUR HYDRO BILL

April 8, 2013

QUEEN’S PARK – The costs of the McGuinty-Wynne Liberals’ power plant scandal are now hitting the hydro bills of Ontarians, Nipissing MPP and PC Energy Critic Vic Fedeli told the Legislature today during Question Period.

Fedeli pointed to the Ontario Energy Board’s 26-page rationale released Friday for the 2.9 per cent hydro rate increase that will take effect on May 1. It explicitly states that costs resulting from the Oakville gas plant cancellation are now figuring into electricity charges in Ontario. The text of Fedeli’s questions is below:
My question is for the Premier. Premier, your Liberal seat-saver gas plant scandal has finally come home to roost on the hydro bills of Ontarians. On Friday, we learned hydro bills for seniors, families and businesses are going up nearly 3%. On page 18 of the Ontario Energy Board’s report, this sentence details the latest hydro hikes:

“The cost of the turbine purchase that is part of the Oakville gas plant cancellation agreement is included in the forecast of global adjustment costs.”

Premier, can you tell us today, how much is the Oakville cancellation really adding to our hydro bills?

Read more

OMA NEWS RELEASE: Powering for the future: New company connects benefits to communities, mining company and the environment

This article was provided by the Ontario Mining Association (OMA), an organization that was established in 1920 to represent the mining industry of the province.

Ontario Mining Association member Goldcorp and 13 First Nations in Northwestern Ontario have formed a partnership to create Wataynikaneyap Power. This new electricity company plans to develop a transmission line to connect remote First Nations to the provincial grid and provide more reliable power to communities and companies already linked to Ontario’s electrical network.

“We have partnered with Goldcorp to establish Wataynikaneyap Power with the goal of First Nations eventually owning 100% of this important infrastructure that will better serve our communities,” said Margaret Kenequanash, representing the 13 First Nations partners in Wataynikaneyap Power. “I look forward to the day we can connect our communities to the provincial power grid – it is safe, reliable and provides cleaner energy.”

“Wataynikaneyap Power is an example of how industry and First Nations can work together on projects that are good for the economy and the environment while benefitting communities in the region for years to come,” said Gil Lawson, Mine Manager for Goldcorp’s Musselwhite Operation. Goldcorp plans to facilitate the completion of phase one of the project and leave the Wataynikaneyap Power partnership once a long-term transmission partner is on board.

Read more

NEWS RELEASE: 13 First Nations and Goldcorp incorporate new electricity transmission company


Northwestern Ontario transmission project will replace diesel generation and provide cleaner, more sustainable power to First Nation communities and industry

THUNDER BAY, ON, April 4, 2013 /CNW/ – Thirteen First Nations and Goldcorp today announced they have signed an agreement formally incorporating Wataynikaneyap Power. This new company is developing a transmission line that will connect remote First Nations communities currently powered by diesel generation, and will provide more reliable power to local communities and industry.

“We have partnered with Goldcorp to establish Wataynikaneyap Power with a goal of First Nations eventually owning 100% of this important infrastructure that will better serve our communities. I look forward to the day we can connect our communities to the provincial power grid – it is safe, reliable and provides for cleaner energy,” said Margaret Kenequanash, representing the 13 First Nations partners in Wataynikaneyap Power.

The company is proposing a single project with a two-phase development process. The first phase, a 300-km transmission line, will reinforce electricity transmission into Pickle Lake, including servicing Goldcorp’s Musselwhite mine. The second phase will extend transmission north of Pickle Lake to service 10 remote First Nation communities.

Read more

Grits’ green push leaves Ontario in the red – by Lorne Gunter (Toronto Sun – April 3, 2013)

http://www.torontosun.com/

Last weekend, the Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation at the University of Toronto began releasing glimpses into a new study it has completed on how badly Ontario is being jobbed by Confederation. Ontarians send about $11 billion more to Ottawa each year than the province gets back in federal spending and transfers. This discrepancy the Mowat Centre refers to as the “fiscal gap.”

I’ve got news for you, Ontario: When it comes to being jobbed by Confederation, you’ve got nothing on Alberta.

Last year Mowat calculated that Albertans sent a similar amount more to Ottawa than the province received in return — and Alberta has one-quarter of Ontario’s population.

But the issue here is the folly of Canada’s vast system of interprovincial wealth transfers called equalization. When even Ontario begins whining that it deserves billions more in equalization, you know the system has become so dysfunctional that the best action would just be to dismantle the whole scheme.

Yes, Ontario has recently fallen on semi-hard times. It has unemployment higher than the national average and less economic growth. Its costs to provide public services are higher than the Canadian average while its ability to raise tax revenues is lower.

Read more

[Ontario] Power Politics: A bizarre series of electrical events – by Livio Di Matteo (Thunder Bay Chronicle-Journal – April 1, 2013)

Thunder Bay Chronicle-Journal is the daily newspaper of Northwestern Ontario.

Livio Di Matteo is Professor of Economics at Lakehead University.

The reality show that is Ontario public policy and politics provides for spectacles that are quite entertaining were it not for their serious consequences. On the one hand, it was not so long ago that the Ontario government spent upwards of 800 million dollars prior to an election to scrap natural gas fired power plants in Mississauga and Oakville that were opposed by local residents. Now, a fiscally awakened Ontario government does not want to spend money to convert Thunder Bay’s coal-fired plant to natural gas, which many local residents say they need. It is indeed unfortunate that these populations could not have been geographically interchanged as they might have saved the Ontario government untold millions of dollars.

Thunder Bay leaders maintain the Thunder Bay generating station must remain open and converted to natural gas. The main argument being employed by our regional leadership in this sorry state of affairs is that with a looming mining boom, the region will be short of power and the Thunder Bay plant must be converted to natural gas to meet this demand and lubricate economic growth. The Ontario Power Authority (OPA) and to date the provincial government maintain that this power demand can be met more cheaply by an expansion of the east-west tie as well as imports of power from Manitoba and Minnesota.

All of this flows from a provincial Green Energy initiative, which in the well-intentioned name of environmental protection, shut down more cost-effective provincial coal plants and invested in cleaner though albeit higher cost wind, solar and natural gas electricity generation. The Thunder Bay and Atikokan plants because of their size and location were relatively minor contributors to Ontario air pollution, but were swept up in what amounted to a one-size-fits all provincial energy policy.

Read more