Ontario Regional Chief Concerned over Ontario Climate Change Legislation (NetNewsLedger.com – May 24, 2016)

http://www.netnewsledger.com/

THUNDER BAY – Ontario Regional Chief Isadore Day is raising caution flags after the Province passed landmark climate change legislation yesterday and neglected any consultation with First Nation leaders.

“On behalf of the Chiefs of Ontario, I am very disappointed that the province did not include First Nations in discussion prior to the passage of this legislation,” said Ontario Regional Chief Day. “In this new era of reconciliation and a new relationship between Ontario and First Nations, we must be treated as equal partners in climate change and carbon economy policy and planning.

At the same time, I am very encouraged by Environment and Climate Change Minister Glen Murray’s commitment to fully engage First Nations in the co-governance of this legislation moving forward. In fact, Minister Murray has stated that our full involvement is critical in order to ensure that the Climate Change Action Plan is a success in the years and decades to come.

Read more

Electric cars and unicorns: Ontario’s new green scheme – by Margaret Wente (Globe and Mail – May 24, 2016)

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/

The future is going to be a lot of fun in Ontario. Just a few years from now, millions of us will be liberated from our evil fossil-fuelled transportation network. Millions of government-subsidized electric cars will whisk us silently to work. Our buses will run on biofuels.

Our retrofitted geothermal-powered homes will keep us warm at prices much higher than today’s natural gas (which would be banned). Vast tracts of land will be diverted to solar panels, which will transform the sun’s rays into clean, green, righteous energy – as soon as we can figure out how to store it and attach it to the grid. Unicorns will frolic in our gardens, and pigs will fly.

Ontario’s new draft Climate Change Action Plan is a breathtaking work of fantasy, wrought by folks who evidently never met an engineer, an economist, or anybody else who knows how the real world works. Glen Murray, the Environment Minister, is a notoriously Big Thinker.

Read more

Leap comes to Ontario with Wynne’s new climate change plan – by Rex Murphy (National Post – May 21, 2016)

http://news.nationalpost.com/

Remember the Leap Manifesto? That was the wild-eyed ultra-greenist, anti-capitalist dogma-sheet that Avi Lewis and Naomi Klein dragged out to the New Democratic Party convention recently. It received a blistering reception from the only NDP premier in Canada, Rachel Notley, and was excoriated by labour leaders in Alberta – where its fanatic zealousness threatened the peace and point of the convention itself.

It is the finest specimen of the Greenist philosophy yet put to hard drive or paper. Kill oil. Kill all fossil fuels. No pipelines. No refineries. Cripple the economy. Deny the poorer nations. If not in your backyard, it should go in no backyard.

No doubt it was meant to be radical. But only if radical now means a cascade of unexamined and baseless assertions, a manifest distaste for reality, a raw pulse of dogmatic certitude, and a set of prescriptions that would obliterate a modern economy, push hundreds of thousands out of work, and bring the industrial age back to the days of horse cart and covered wagons for transportation.

Read more

Ontario Aboriginal Minister accused of betraying First Nations – by Alan S. Hale (Timmins Daily Press – May 20, 2016)

http://www.timminspress.com/

TIMMINS – Discussion during the final day of the Nishnawbe Aski Nation’s Spring Chiefs Assembly got quite heated after provincial Aboriginal Affairs Minister David Zimmer was the only one out of the three expected government ministers to come and field questions from the chiefs and other delegates.

When it came to his turn to ask a question, Mushkegowuk Council Grand Chief Jonathon Solomon tore into Zimmer about the Liberal government’s climate change legislation which was announced on Wednesday. Solomon called the legislation a “betrayal” and a continuation of the practice of considering the interests of First Nations as an afterthought.

“Mr. Minister I have a lot of respect for you, and I am being respectful when I say that I feel that I have been betrayed. I feel that there is a knife sticking in my back because we have been talking about an honourable relationship, but nothing has really changed,” said a visibly angry Solomon. “They say the Harper era was terrible, we say the Harris era was terrible in this province, but those practices are still continuing despite talk of a positive relationship.”

Read more

Ontario’s focus on electric cars a challenge for auto industry – by Cameron French (Yahoo.com – May 19, 2016)

https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/

Insight – Ontario is hitting the gas pedal on adoption of the electric car, but in order to meet the government’s aggressive goals, consumers and industry will have to accept some big changes, according to experts.

The provincial government’s $7 billion climate-change strategy, leaked this week in The Globe and Mail, lays out $285 million in electric vehicle (EV) incentives, including up to $14,000 on each car purchased, as well as cheap power and a pledge to build charging stations. The goal is to have 12 per cent of all vehicle sales to be electric by 2025, compared to the current levels of a fraction of one per cent.

But don’t expect to be fighting lineups down at the Tesla dealership just yet, say analysts. “Believe me, I would love to see more electric cars as much as everyone else, but 5 per cent by 2020 and 12 per cent by 2025… I think it’s a tad unrealistic,” says Kumar Saha, aftermarket research manager at consulting firm Frost & Sullivan.

Read more

NEWS RELEASE: NAN CONDEMNS ONTARIO CLIMATE CHANGE BILL

TIMMINS, ON (May 18, 2016): Nishnawbe Aski Nation (NAN) has condemned the passing of climate change legislation by the Government of Ontario today as a misleading and misguided approach to a green economy that will have significant and far-reaching effects across NAN territory.

“In its announcement today the Government of Ontario lauds extensive consultations before the adoption of this legislation, including engagement with First Nations. We find this offensive in its lack of truth, as neither NAN nor our communities were consulted before the adoption of this bill,” said Deputy Grand Chief Derek Fox.

“Our First Nations are not blind to the fact that this legislation produces potentially huge financial windfalls for Ontario, and they are justifiably concerned that there is no mention in the legislation of how these gains will be shared with them.” NAN is demanding a meeting with Premier Kathleen Wynne, Environment Minister Glen Murray and other members of cabinet to examine the ramifications of their government’s actions.

Read more

Why is Ontario’s green plan powered by so much central planning? – by Globe Editorial (May 18, 2016)

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/

The Ontario Liberal government’s ambitious “Draft Climate Change Action Plan,” the text of which was leaked to The Globe and revealed on Monday, left us scratching our heads. The problem is not the ambition: Ontario has rightly pledged to reduce greenhouse gases, with 1990 emission levels to be cut by 15 per cent in 2020, 37 per cent by 2030 and 80 per cent by 2050.

Those targets won’t be easy to achieve, but if the science on global warming is right (we think it is), and if the international commitments that Canada and much of the world have signed onto mean anything (they should), then a long-term plan to steadily reduce greenhouse gas output is necessary.

It’s not Ontario’s low-carbon destination that has amber lights flashing. It’s the road it is choosing to get there. Governments are terrible at central planning.

Read more

Climate crazy Ontari-ari-ario’s no place to grow, but to get the hell out of – by Ross McKitrick (Financial Post – May 18, 2016)

http://business.financialpost.com/

“Ontario is responsible for such a tiny fraction of global
emissions.[About 0.5%] The Wynne government repeatedly defends
its bungling of the electricity sector on the grounds that at
least it closed two coal-fired power plants. Meanwhile, in
2015 alone, China approved construction of 155 new coal-fired
power plants. … The climate file has pushed deranged
extremism into mainstream policy planning.”

The latest news out of Queen’s Park is that Kathleen Wynne’s Liberals plan to deindustrialize Ontario. Of course they don’t call it that; they prefer the term “decarbonize.” But for an industrial economy, the government’s new climate action plan, leaked to reporters this week, amounts to the same thing.

The proposed scheme beggars belief. Having phased out coal-fired power, the province now plans to phase out natural gas, the only reliable alternative for non-baseload generation. Despite electric cars being extremely costly and unpopular, more than one in 10 new car sales will need to be electric, and every two-car household will have to own at least one electric car.

Read more

Trudeau’s reliance on West to meet hefty greenhouse gas emission reductions could backfire – by Claudia Cattaneo (Financial Post – May 17, 2016)

http://business.financialpost.com/

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made ambitious commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Paris last December — and now he will lean heavily on Canada’s western provinces to ensure he meets them.

That’s the unsettling conclusion of a report by the Canada West Foundation (CWF), appropriately titled “Look Out,” which urges Western provinces to “bury the hatchet” after years of bickering over pipelines and form a common front to protect their resource-based economies from Ottawa’s coming power grab.

The report by the Calgary-based think-tank, released Monday, also urges Western provinces to develop a common carbon price and design climate change policies appropriate for their economies, such as building a Western electricity grid that uses hydro produced in British Columbia and Manitoba to help Alberta and Saskatchewan get off coal and natural gas.

Read more

Energy, auto sectors raise red flags over Ontario climate plan – by Adrian Morrow and Greg Keenan (Globe and Mail – May 17, 2016)

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/

TORONTO – Ontario’s energy and auto industries say they were surprised by the province’s ambitious plan to slash greenhouse gases, warning that it will drive up home heating costs by as much as $3,000 for homeowners, and that auto makers will not produce enough electric cars to meet its targets.

Environmentalists, meanwhile, say the blueprint puts the province in the vanguard of the battle against climate change, outpacing every other province but Quebec.

The Liberal government’s $7-billion Climate Change Action Plan, scheduled for release in June but obtained this week by The Globe and Mail, promises to start phasing out natural gas for home heating. This will be done partly through incentives for owners of homes and buildings to install geothermal and solar heating, and partly by changes to the building code mandating that, by 2030, all new houses and small buildings be heated by something other than fossil fuels. Natural gas currently provides 76 per cent of the province’s heat.

Read more

Ontario’s big, green assisted economic suicide plan – by Kevin Libin (Financial Post – May 17, 2016)

http://business.financialpost.com/

“In assessing “investment changes in key economic sectors” resulting
from carbon pricing, the roundtable bluntly projected that spending
in the mineral and freight transport sector would virtually dry up due
to “reduced output” (refining, too, although that’s meant as a feature,
not a bug). Investment would also shrink in those “value-added”
industries that provincial governments love — from cars and paper
mills, to chemicals, metals, and building construction.”

To get an idea of what Ontario could look like a couple of decades out under Liberal energy minister Glen Murray’s “climate action plan” — which was revealed in detail in Monday’s Globe and Mail — who better to rely on than the man himself, Glen Murray?

Back in 2008, when he chaired the National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy, Murray — along with his acting CEO, Alex Wood, now executive director of the Ontario Climate Change Directorate — offered up a plan that looked remarkably similar to the new Liberal cabinet document. In fairness, the NRTEE document hardly offered the perniciously micro-managed prescriptions for people and businesses that Murray has graduated to now.

Read more

Ontario to spend $7-billion on sweeping climate change plan – by Adrian Morrow and Greg Keenan (Globe and Mail – May 16, 2016)

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/

TORONTO — The Ontario government will spend more than $7-billion over four years on a sweeping climate change plan that will affect every aspect of life – from what people drive to how they heat their homes and workplaces – in a bid to slash the province’s carbon footprint.

Ontario will begin phasing out natural gas for heating, provide incentives to retrofit buildings and give rebates to drivers who buy electric vehicles. It will also require that gasoline sold in the province contain less carbon, bring in building code rules requiring all new homes by 2030 to be heated with electricity or geothermal systems, and set a target for 12 per cent of all new vehicle sales to be electric by 2025.

While such policies are likely to be popular with ecoconscious voters, who will now receive government help to green their lives, they are certain to cause mass disruption for the province’s automotive and energy sectors, which will have to make significant changes to the way they do business. And they have already created tension within the government between Environment Minister Glen Murray and some of his fellow ministers who worry he is going too far.

Read more

Ontario climate plan signals stormy future – Postmedia Network Editorial (Brantford Expositor – May 10, 2016)

http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/

Premier Kathleen Wynne is preparing to impose another suite of climate-related energy policies on the province. The Climate Change Action Plan promises to be even more expensive and more economically intrusive than the Green Energy Act. Which should give voters cause for alarm.

The public details of the plan that have emerged so far outline a policy thrust that sounds more like a war on personal mobility and the automotive industry than an environmental blueprint. It has already proved so concerning to the auto industry that the government has been forced to reassure the sector it means it no harm.

For instance, draft plans of the policy say Ontario intends to require that 80% of the province either walk, take transit or bike to work by 2050. How are they going to do that without imposing draconian new rules on where companies choose to invest and where people live? It’s hard to imagine that rule applying in Ontario counties where bus service is limited.

Read more

Editorial If coal is too dirty for the U.S., why would Oakland build a dock to export it to Asia? (Los Angeles Times – May 9, 2016)

http://www.latimes.com/

If coal is indeed king, it is the lord of a shrinking realm, which ought to be good news for the environment. With the nation’s electricity production shifting to cleaner sources of power, U.S. coal consumption is declining.

But here’s a problem: As major coal-mining companies watch their sales diminish domestically, they are struggling to find export markets in which they can continue to do business. And what have we really gained if coal that the U.S. doesn’t use just gets shipped to other countries for them to burn?

That’s the question that needs to be answered as officials consider a proposal to build a new coal port in Oakland as part of the conversion of a decommissioned Army base. There are a lot of problems with the proposal, which we’ll get to, but just from an environmental standpoint, it is a bad idea.

Read more

Donald Trump Says He’ll Bring Back Jobs For Coal Miners But He’s Just Blowing Smoke – by Joe Romm (Think Progress.org – May 4, 2016)

http://thinkprogress.org/

Donald Trump markets himself as a business-savvy billionaire who will get American jobs back from countries like China. In the case of the coal industry, however, he appears to be just a very clueless politician making pro-pollution promises he can’t keep.

“I’m a free-market guy, but not when you’re getting killed,” he said recently at a rally in Carmel, Indiana. “Look at steel, it’s being wiped out. Your coal industry is wiped out, and China is taking our coal.” Huh? “China is taking our coal”? If China were taking much of our coal (in the form of U.S. exports) that would be great for coal jobs.

If Trump meant Chinese coal exports are taking away our coal market (i.e. potential U.S. sales overseas), then he is truly clueless about the coal business. China flipped from net coal exporter to net importer back in 2009 (!) and quickly became the world’s biggest importer.

Read more