Road to Ring of Fire could cost up to $550-million – by Bill Curry (Globe and Mail – August 27, 2016)

OTTAWA — A road connecting remote First Nations in Northern Ontario’s Ring of Fire region to the south would cost $264-million to $559-million, according to a government-funded study that reviewed a range of options.

The All-Season Community Road Study has not yet been made public, but The Globe and Mail has obtained a copy of the 147-page document, which is described as final and is dated June 30, 2016.

The $785,000 study was paid for by the federal and provincial governments. Ottawa and Ontario are considering options to address the needs of remote First Nations while also responding to the potential for major mining development in Ontario’s far north if the region is made accessible through a new road or rail line.

The Ring of Fire is a large mineral deposit about 500 kilometres northeast of Thunder Bay. It is estimated that it would be worth billions if resources companies had road or rail access. That has prompted Ontario to pledge $1-billion toward infrastructure in the region, and the province has called on Ottawa to match that amount.

The study involved discussions with four small and remote northern communities: Webequie First Nation, Eabametoong First Nation, Neskantaga First Nation and Nibinamik First Nation. Technical work was conducted by SNC-Lavalin Group Inc., a global engineering and construction firm.

The cost estimate varies based on the route options and whether the roads would be paved. The figures are similar to an industry estimate from 2012 that a road to the Ring of Fire would cost about $500-million. One mining firm with interests in the region – KWG Resources Inc. – released its own estimate on Friday from GreenForest Management Inc., a company with experience building logging roads. That estimate put the price at $83.6-million to $99.9-million to access the deposits and up to $73.1-million more to connect area First Nations to the main road.

For the rest of this article, click here: