Anglo American pulls out of Alaska mines project – by Suzanne Goldenberg (The Guardian – September 16, 2013)

Company withdraws from plans to develop vast open-pit gold and copper mines in an area of pristine streams and wetlands

Anglo American withdrew on Monday from plans to develop vast open-pit gold and copper mines in one of the last big wild salmon runs in Alaska’s Bristol Bay.

The company said in a statement that it was pulling out of the Pebble mine project, spread across rolling tundra about 200 miles south-west of Anchorage, despite the huge mineral potential. The area is believed to hold the world’s richest gold deposits, but Anglo American’s exit could now put the entire project in jeopardy.

“Despite our belief that Pebble is a deposit of rare magnitude and quality, we have taken the decision to withdraw, following a thorough assessment of Anglo American’s extensive pipeline of long-dated project options,” the company’s chief executive, Mark Cutifani, said in a statement.

“Our focus has been to prioritise capital to projects with the highest value and lowest risks within our portfolio and reduce the capital required to sustain such projects during the pre-approval phases of development,” he went on.

Anglo American’s withdrawal and the uncertainty over the project brings a temporary pause to what had been expected to be a long and bitter fight between mining companies and their opponents.

The Pebble mine was seen as one of the most important environmental decisions on Barack Obama’s second term agenda – even though it was overshadowed at times by the controversy over the Keystone XL pipeline.

The mining companies and their opponents were gearing up for a big and expensive lobbying and advertising campaign over the project. The two companies in the Pebble venture spent $500,000 last year to lobby members of Congress for its approval.

Monday’s announcement from Anglo American may have been the result of growing uncertainty over whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would approve the project, in light of its threat to miles of pristine streams and wetlands, habitat for half of the world’s sockeye salmon.

Every summer, 30 to 40 million sockeye salmon return to the bay to spawn.

Environmental campaigners and local native Alaskan communities had fiercely opposed the project, arguing that it posed a threat to the commercial fishing industry as well as their traditional way of life.

But even more tellingly for Anglo American were the signs that the EPA was disinclined to give the project a swift go-ahead.

For the rest of this article, click here: