Barrick now eclipsed by Goldcorp for title of largest market cap – by Peter Koven (National Post – November 6, 2012)

The National Post is Canada’s second largest national paper.

Barrick Gold Corp. is by far the world’s largest gold producer. It has the most mines and the most reserves. But it is no longer No. 1 where it matters most.

In recent days, Barrick has been eclipsed by Goldcorp Inc. for the title of largest market capitalization in the gold sector. It is an embarrassing development for Barrick, and comes shortly after the company went through a CEO change and reported massive cost escalation at its key growth project.

Goldcorp enjoys a premium valuation that Barrick can only dream of right now. Pawel Rajszel, an analyst at Veritas Investment Research, calculated that Goldcorp trades at 10.7 times forward cash flows, compared to 5.3 times for Barrick. Mackie Research Capital analyst Barry Allan has Goldcorp trading right at net asset value, while Barrick is at a 20% discount.

Their relative valuations prove that production is only a small part of the story when investors compare senior gold miners.

Barrick is aiming to churn out 7.3 to 7.8 million ounces of gold this year, more than triple Goldcorp’s guidance (2.35 to 2.45 million). However, Goldcorp has the better growth profile. While Barrick plans to have a production base of at least eight million ounces by 2015, Goldcorp hopes to reach 4.2 million ounces by 2016, nearly double the current level. And since Goldcorp has much less production, each mine that comes onstream has a greater impact on its earnings and cash flows.

Thanks to secondary production of copper, silver and other metals, Goldcorp also enjoys lower costs and higher margins than Barrick. In the third quarter of 2012, Goldcorp’s margin was US$1,465 an ounce, compared to US$1,118 for Barrick.

Goldcorp’s market value has been close to Barrick’s for a number of years, but what finally put it over the top was Barrick’s recent turbulence. Former CEO Aaron Regent was fired in July over a weak share price, and the company is dealing with soaring costs at its Pascua-Lama project on the Chile-Argentina border, which have climbed to as much as US$8.5-billion. Investors remain confused about its base metal strategy after it spent $7.3-billion on a copper acquisition last year.

For the rest of the National Post, please go to the National Post website: